<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Harvard Blogs vs. Bloglines?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whirlycott.com/phil/2006/04/03/harvard-blogs-vs-bloglines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whirlycott.com/phil/2006/04/03/harvard-blogs-vs-bloglines/</link>
	<description>Philip Jacob's web page</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:49:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Decline of Bloglines &#187; Wagalulu - Web Development &#187; &#187; The Decline of Bloglines</title>
		<link>http://www.whirlycott.com/phil/2006/04/03/harvard-blogs-vs-bloglines/comment-page-1/#comment-3791</link>
		<dc:creator>The Decline of Bloglines &#187; Wagalulu - Web Development &#187; &#187; The Decline of Bloglines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 16:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whirlycott.com/phil/2006/04/03/harvard-blogs-vs-bloglines/#comment-3791</guid>
		<description>[...] for 2006-07-14 [del.icio.us] &#187; Bookmark on del.icio.us The long decline of Bloglines continues, from Web 2.0 startup fav to broken engine owned by Ask.This time, it&#8217;s the Top Links, Top Declining Links and Top Gaining Links, which have been reporting blanks of late. The biggest problem with Web 2.0 is that everything eventually breaks. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for 2006-07-14 [del.icio.us] &raquo; Bookmark on del.icio.us The long decline of Bloglines continues, from Web 2.0 startup fav to broken engine owned by Ask.This time, it&#8217;s the Top Links, Top Declining Links and Top Gaining Links, which have been reporting blanks of late. The biggest problem with Web 2.0 is that everything eventually breaks. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.whirlycott.com/phil/2006/04/03/harvard-blogs-vs-bloglines/comment-page-1/#comment-1663</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 22:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whirlycott.com/phil/2006/04/03/harvard-blogs-vs-bloglines/#comment-1663</guid>
		<description>Currently trying http://www.newsalloy.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Currently trying <a href="http://www.newsalloy.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.newsalloy.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.whirlycott.com/phil/2006/04/03/harvard-blogs-vs-bloglines/comment-page-1/#comment-1662</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 22:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whirlycott.com/phil/2006/04/03/harvard-blogs-vs-bloglines/#comment-1662</guid>
		<description>I didnt like Google Reader at all either. I use bloglines... sometimes it does seem to break.

I tried rojo.com the other day, but at at glance, it didnt give me new articles count, it didnt import my opml export from bloglines as i expected it. I did like their sort options... but i quickly jumped back to bloglines.

I tried rojo.com after seeing this article:

http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/30/the-state-of-online-feed-readers/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didnt like Google Reader at all either. I use bloglines&#8230; sometimes it does seem to break.</p>
<p>I tried rojo.com the other day, but at at glance, it didnt give me new articles count, it didnt import my opml export from bloglines as i expected it. I did like their sort options&#8230; but i quickly jumped back to bloglines.</p>
<p>I tried rojo.com after seeing this article:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/30/the-state-of-online-feed-readers/" rel="nofollow">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/03/30/the-state-of-online-feed-readers/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Jacob</title>
		<link>http://www.whirlycott.com/phil/2006/04/03/harvard-blogs-vs-bloglines/comment-page-1/#comment-1661</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 19:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whirlycott.com/phil/2006/04/03/harvard-blogs-vs-bloglines/#comment-1661</guid>
		<description>I really don&#039;t like Google Reader.  I tried it when it came out and thought it was really slow.  And I tried it about a week ago and I really don&#039;t like the interface at all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t like Google Reader.  I tried it when it came out and thought it was really slow.  And I tried it about a week ago and I really don&#8217;t like the interface at all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis</title>
		<link>http://www.whirlycott.com/phil/2006/04/03/harvard-blogs-vs-bloglines/comment-page-1/#comment-1660</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 18:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whirlycott.com/phil/2006/04/03/harvard-blogs-vs-bloglines/#comment-1660</guid>
		<description>Or you could wait a month for us to get a blog server that doesn&#039;t blow gigantic chunks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or you could wait a month for us to get a blog server that doesn&#8217;t blow gigantic chunks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel</title>
		<link>http://www.whirlycott.com/phil/2006/04/03/harvard-blogs-vs-bloglines/comment-page-1/#comment-1659</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 18:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whirlycott.com/phil/2006/04/03/harvard-blogs-vs-bloglines/#comment-1659</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t noticed anything like that.
You can always try Google Reader: http://www.google.com/reader/view/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t noticed anything like that.<br />
You can always try Google Reader: <a href="http://www.google.com/reader/view/" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/reader/view/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
